MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888844257 · doi:10.1002/sim.7942

Estimation in generalized linear models under censored covariates with an application to MIREC data

2018· article· en· W2888844257 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueStatistics in Medicine · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityHealth Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHealth CanadaMinistry of Natural Resources
KeywordsCovariateEstimatorGeneralized linear modelStatisticsEconometricsGeneralized estimating equationComputer scienceLinear modelMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In many biological experiments, certain values of a biomarker are often nondetectable due to low concentrations of an analyte or the limitations of a chemical analysis device, resulting in left-censored values. There is an increasing demand for the analysis of data subject to detection limits in clinical and environmental studies. In this paper, we develop a novel statistical method for the maximum likelihood estimation in generalized linear models with covariates subject to detection limits. Simulations are carried out to study the relative performance of the proposed estimators, as compared to other existing estimators. The proposed method is also applied to a real dataset from the Maternal-Infant Research on Environmental Chemicals cohort study, where we investigate how different chemical mixtures affect the health outcomes of infants and pregnant women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.479
Threshold uncertainty score0.525

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.453
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it