MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2888874134 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.69753

Canada Food Guide’s focus on reducing saturated fat contradicts evidence

2018· letter· en· W2888874134 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Barbra Allen Bradshaw, Carol Loffelmann

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2018
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutritional Studies and Diet
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalAbbotsford Veterinary Clinic
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSaturated fatFood labelingHealth professionalsFood guideGerontologyFood scienceHealth carePolitical scienceInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We read the article by Drs. Grant and Jenkins with interest.[1][1] We represent a growing group of Canadian physicians and health professionals called the Canadian Clinicians for Therapeutic Nutrition, who use whole food nutritional strategies to prevent and often reverse the burden of chronic

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.085
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.492
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.085
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0110.011
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0060.003
Research integrity0.0570.075
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association Journal→Same topicNutritional Studies and Diet→French-language works237,207→