MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888878267 · doi:10.1109/tsg.2018.2868130

Practical Energy Management Systems for Isolated Microgrids

2018· article· en· W2888878267 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMicrogridEnergy management systemLinearizationEnergy managementBenchmark (surveying)Electric power systemVoltagePower system simulationAC powerComputer scienceInteger programmingMathematical optimizationControl theory (sociology)ComputationPower (physics)EngineeringEnergy (signal processing)Control engineeringElectrical engineeringNonlinear systemControl (management)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents practical energy management system (EMS) models which consider the operational constraints of distributed energy resources, active-reactive power balance, unbalanced system configuration and loading, and voltage dependent loads. A novel linearization approach is proposed and validated based on the fact that, for isolated microgrids, due to the characteristics of feeders, network losses, and voltage drops across feeders are relatively small. The proposed EMS models are mixed integer quadratic programming problems, requiring less computation time and thus suitable for online applications. The practical EMS models are compared with a typical decoupled unit commitment and optimal power flow-based EMS with and without consideration of system unbalancing. The models, along with “standard” EMS models, are tested, validated, and compared using a CIGRE medium voltage benchmark system and the real isolated microgrid of Kasabonika Lake First Nation in Northern Ontario, Canada. The presented results demonstrate the effectiveness and practicability of the proposed models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.711

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it