MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888884259 · doi:10.1145/3233245

<scp>S</scp> L <scp>I</scp> SCP-light

2018· article· en· W2888884259 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptographic Implementations and Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceOverhead (engineering)CryptographyHash functionAuthentication (law)ThroughputComputer networkFunction (biology)Distributed computingEmbedded systemWirelessComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The emerging areas in which highly resource constrained devices are interacting wirelessly to accomplish tasks have led manufacturers to embed communication systems in them. Tiny low-end devices such as sensor networks nodes and Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) tags are of particular importance due to their vulnerability to security attacks, which makes protecting their communication privacy and authenticity an essential matter. In this work, we present a lightweight do-it-all cryptographic design that offers the basic underlying functionalities to secure embedded communication systems in tiny devices. Specifically, we revisit the design approach of the sLiSCP family of lightweight cryptographic permutations, which was proposed in SAC 2017. sLiSCP is designed to be used in a unified duplex sponge construction to provide minimal overhead for multiple cryptographic functionalities within one hardware design. The design of sLiSCP follows a 4-subblock Type-2 Generalized Feistel-like Structure (GFS) with unkeyed round-reduced Simeck as the round function, which are extremely efficient building blocks in terms of their hardware area requirements. In S L I SCP-light, we tweak the GFS design and turn it into an elegant Partial Substitution-Permutation Network construction, which further reduces the hardware areas of the S L I SCP permutations by around 16% of their original values. The new design also enhances the bit diffusion and algebraic properties of the permutations and enables us to reduce the number of steps, thus achieving a better throughput in both the hashing and authentication modes. We perform a thorough security analysis of the new design with respect to its diffusion, differential and linear, and algebraic properties. For S L I SCP-light-192, we report parallel implementation hardware areas of 1,820 (respectively, 1,892)GE in CMOS 65 nm (respectively, 130 nm ) ASIC. The areas for S L I SCP-light-256 are 2,397 and 2,500GE in CMOS 65 nm and 130 nm ASIC, respectively. Overall, the unified duplex sponge mode of S L I SCP-light-192, which provides (authenticated) encryption and hashing functionalities, satisfies the area (1,958GE), power (3.97μ W ), and throughput (44.4kbps) requirements of passive RFID tags.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.784
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it