MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P2484Radiation dose reduction in cardiac CT: results from the prospective multicenter registry on radiation dose estimates of cardiac CT angiography in daily practice in 2017

2018· article· en· W2888895952 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas J. Stocker, Mathias Heckner, Simon Deseive, Jonathon Leipsic, Min Chen, Ronen Rubinshtein, Martin Hadamitzky, Jeroen J. Bax, Erik Lerkevang Grove, John R. Lesser, Xiangming Fang, Pál Maurovich‐Horvat, James Otton, Sanghoon Shin, Jörg Hausleiter

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiation Dose and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRadiation doseAngiographyRadiologyReduction (mathematics)Nuclear medicineCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The radiation exposure reported in cardiac CT studies has raised concerns. In 2007, the international PROTECTION I registry estimated the radiation exposure of cardiac CT angiographies with a median dose-length product (DLP) of 885 mGy*cm. Since then, numerous advances in CT technology as well as scan protocols have been developed for dose reduction, but their efficacy in clinical practice is largely unknown. Purpose: The PROTECTION VI study is a multicenter, prospective, worldwide registry designed to evaluate radiation dose exposure and utilization of dosesaving strategies for contrast-enhanced cardiac CT angiography in daily practice. Methods: 60 study sites from 32 different countries participated and enrolled all patients undergoing cardiac CT during one calendar month in 2017. To date core-lab collected image and scan data of 4500 patients have been analyzed. DLP was the main outcome measure. Linear regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors associated with dose. Results: The median DLP of 4500 cardiac CT studies was 244 mGy*cm (interquartile range: 148 to 360 mGy*cm), which corresponds to an estimated effective dose of 3.4 mSv (conversion factor k = 0.014 mSv*(mGy*cm)-1). When compared with PROTECTION I, the DLP was reduced by approximately 72% (p<0.001). A >30x variability in median DLP was observed between study sites (range of median DLP: 74 to 2289 mGy*cm). The most frequent indication for cardiac CT was the evaluation of coronary artery disease in 88% of patients. Among patient-related factors, multivariable linear regression analysis identified body weight as the predominant independent predictor for higher radiation dose of coronary CT angiography, whereas the use of low tube voltage and the selection of scan protocols were predominant acquisition-related independent predictors for radiation exposure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicRadiation Dose and ImagingFrench-language works237,207