MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2888907362 · doi:10.22215/etd/2016-11400

La représentation du français parlé dans quatre pièces de théâtre québécoises.

2016· dissertation· fr· W2888907362 on OpenAlexaff
King Acquah

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La présente étude examine la représentation du français parlé dans quatre pièces de théâtre québécoises.L'étude permet de mettre en évidence la représentation à l'écrit, des quatre variables linguistiques étudiées par des sociolinguistes portant sur des corpus oraux.Il y a également la mise en exergue de l'influence que le changement du statut du français au Québec apporte sur la représentation de ces variables dans les pièces.Cette étude s'articule autour de six moments forts.Le premier chapitre décrit la variété du français considérée.Le deuxième chapitre présente la dramaturgie québécoise, le concept de la représentation, et les pièces de théâtre.Le chapitre trois traite des variables et de la méthodologie de la recherche.Les chapitres quatre et cinq présentent l'analyse des résultats et le chapitre six compare les résultats aux études empiriques.L'étude se termine par une conclusion résumant le travail et mettant en relief quelques contributions de l'étude.iv

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.262

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis→French-language works237,207→