MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888910292 · doi:10.1109/lmwc.2018.2863720

Doherty Transmitter Based on Monopole Array Antenna Active Load Modulation

2018· article· en· W2888910292 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Power Amplifier Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsAlberta Innovates - Technology Futures
KeywordsTransmitterAmplifierElectrical engineeringBandwidth (computing)Electronic engineeringEngineeringAntenna (radio)Radio transmitter designDipole antennaModulation (music)AcousticsPhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This letter presents a new antenna topology to implement the load modulation in the Doherty transmitter, which resulted in enhancing the bandwidth compared to previous works. The active load modulation is realized by using a monopole array antenna, which serves as both Doherty combiner and wave radiator. The load impedances of amplifiers can be dynamically tuned through the mutual coupling of the array elements. Detailed design equations and procedures are developed. For verification, a Doherty transmitter operating at 1.95-2.10 GHz has been designed and fabricated using GaN HEMT transistors. The prototype transmitter exhibited a power-added efficiency of 53% at peak power level and maintained an efficiency of 43% at 6.8-dB backoff, over the frequency band of 1.95-2.10 GHz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.378
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it