Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans sa conférence de clôture présentée lors du premier colloque du CRI en 1999, Éric Méchoulan se questionnait déjà sur l’étrange usage, que font certains chercheurs en études intermédiales, des ouvrages de Gilles Deleuze : « [...] il faudrait à ce moment-là se dire que l’intermédialité ne consisterait pas tant à traquer les jeux incessants et innombrables des médiations qui nous constituent, mais plus sourdement à repérer les moments d'immédiateté qui nous emportent. » C’est la lecture de cette phrase qui a déclenché la présente réflexion; on tentera justement d’articuler théoriquement ces deux manières de penser l’intermédialité, en décrivant par le biais de la philosophie deleuzienne ce que l’on pourrait définir comme une dynamique tensive entre les médiations et ce que Méchoulan appelle les immédiatetés complexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.020 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".