MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888952684 · doi:10.5539/mas.v12n9p234

An Insight to Middleware Technologies used for Cloud Computing Frameworks: From the Perspective of Successful Enterprise Application Integration

2018· article· en· W2888952684 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Osama Harfoushi, Ruba Obiedat

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMiddleware (distributed applications)Cloud computingComputer scienceEnterprise application integrationPerspective (graphical)Data scienceArchitectureWorld Wide WebSoftware engineeringDatabaseEnterprise architectureOperating systemEnterprise systems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At present, the use of middleware technologies has been observed to be used by the companies for successful enterprise application integration (EAI). The EAI can helps in integrating the data and information relating to the systems. Thus, the study focuses on highlighting a brief overview of the EAI along with its architecture. The study has also focused on providing a concise description of all the middleware technologies and the frameworks of cloud computing. In addition, the research study has also focused on using qualitative approach collecting data and information for obtaining data relating to the middleware technologies with respect to the cloud computing and its alignment with EAI. Thus, it can be stated that the use of the middleware technologies can significantly help the companies to cloud computing framework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0160.013
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207