MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888969711 · doi:10.1353/hsf.2018.0019

Moors Dressed as Moors: Clothing, Social Distinction, and Ethnicity in Early Modern Iberia by Javier Irigoyen-García

2018· article· en· W2888969711 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lisa M. James

Bibliographic record

VenueHispanófila/Hispanófila · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval and Early Modern Iberia
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoorsGarciaHistoryNobilityEthnic groupBlackfaceClothingIdentity (music)ArtClassicsHumanitiesAncient historyPoliticsSociologyArchaeologyAnthropologyLawArt historyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Moors Dressed as Moors: Clothing, Social Distinction, and Ethnicity in Early Modern Iberia by Javier Irigoyen-García Lisa James Irigoyen-García, Javier. Moors Dressed as Moors: Clothing, Social Distinction, and Ethnicity in Early Modern Iberia. Toronto: U Toronto P, 2017. 324 pp. ISBN: 97-814-8750-160-0. In his most recent book, Moors Dressed as Moors: Clothing, Social Distinction, and Ethnicity in Early Modern Iberia, Javier Irigoyen-García enriches critical scholarship on the production of legal and sartorial codes surrounding the uprising of the Alpujarras in Granada in 1568. The author reframes the issue of Moorish dress through an interdisciplinary reading of its social and commercial value as a vehicle for economic mobility, against the common tendency to read Moorish clothing exclusively as a marker of religious and ethnic identity. Through a wealth of archival research of edicts and decrees stipulating sumptuary prohibitions; inventories, festival books, and municipal archives; and literary works, most pointedly the Lopean legacy of the nueva comedia, Irigoyen-García debunks the common assumption that "passing" (as Moor) was unequivocally tied to a decontextualized and dislocated politics of Moorish-Christian identity. The author builds his thesis, issuing from the pun after which he titles his book, with a compelling analysis of how Moorish clothing, and the surrounding material conditions of its use and production, came to designate hidalguía, if not nobility, and, from the end of the Reconquista until Philip III's edict of expulsion (1609-14), was thereby coveted by Moors and Christians as real and imagined social capital. A first to reinvest emphasis in the concrete import of dress as a positive strategy in favor of social distinction, this book successfully argues that the material conditions of the cultural domains in question, and the legislation that arises from these conditions, have been underexamined as generators of historical assumptions and frames for confronting Spain's complex past and the "ambiguous semantics … of the Spanish moro" (4), during roughly a century and a half of autos de fé, forced religious conversions, and expulsions of Moors and moriscos from kingdoms across Iberia. Irigoyen-García divides the book into two parts. The first part purports to "disen-tangle the cultural chiasmus" of Moorish-Christian relations (11), often misconstrued by scholars as a mix of infatuation and imitation of the idealized Moor, per romancero representations, pitted against the expurgation of ethnic otherness through political [End Page 197] edicts. The author's misgivings about facile interpretations of a Christian-Moor identity complex, by now a well-worn commonplace within literary and cultural studies, extricates from the stalemate fresh perspectives that help readers move beyond abstractive and blighted views of the post-c onvivencia epoch that have been tailored to meet predictable narratives of cultural conflict. He achieves this in Chapter 1 with an overview of the royally-sanctioned game of canes, treated as military exercises and social practices instead of "extraordinary, carnivalesque performances" (34), as has become the norm of analysis for Moorish artefacts in recent years. Chapter 2 chronicles the trickle-down effects of these equestrian performances at the municipal level, funneled through real motivations and not simply nostalgic or folkloric imaginings of otherness. Chapter 3, although less innovative in its assessment of the figure of the idealized Moor ("literary maurophilia") as a constant of late sixteenth-century ballads, coaxes from the literary imaginary some important elisions from official discourses about "the social demand for models of Moorishness" (60), and contrasts these exempla with the romances anti-moriscos featuring impoverished Morisco laborers to highlight the important point that the game of canes equally bred maurophobic reactions(61). Chapter 4 furthers the real-imaginary dialectic, arguing that Lope's plays were not standalone cases of authorial self-fashioning, but that plots and characters were selected in corroboration with the circulation and availability of liveries. Once again, the author does well to prove that these liveries had real and not just imagined value, and that they had a hand in cementing the social and economic landscape of seventeenth-century Iberia. The second part of the book ventures into the moralist thought of royal authority and town councils, arguing that legislation, akin to visual...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHispanófila/HispanófilaSame topicMedieval and Early Modern IberiaFrench-language works237,207