The Learning Experiences of Guro 21 Completers: A Phenomenology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this undertaking was to describe the learning experiences of GURO 21 Completers in the workplace. Employing phenomenological approach with 14 GURO 21 completers, who underwent in depth interview and focused group discussion, the results of the interview were transcribed, translated and coded to produce root and branch codes. As regards to the experiences, the following were the emerged themes: overload of tasks and responsibilities, scarce technological and financial resource, opportunity to be under tutelage of first-rate mentors, personal and professional achievement, heightened commitment and capability, reinforced instructional competence. As to their coping strategies, the themes were: collaboration and sharing, embracing technology, organization and planning, creativity and innovation and diligence and commitment. As to their aspirations, the themes generated were PLLP is an indispensable tool, 21 st Century teachers are life-long learners, 21 st Century teachers have special traits and competencies and 21 st Century teaching require suitable resources and facilities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".