MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888974989 · doi:10.22168/2237-6321-21129

Intervention on reading comprehension: an approach designed for students with Asperger’s Syndrome (AS)

2018· article· pt· W2888974989 on OpenAlexaff
Lidia Correia, Wilson Júnior de Araújo Carvalho, Becky Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueEntrepalavras · 2018
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Digital Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyReading (process)Developmental psychologyPhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo reporta um dos resultados de um estudo que examinou a compreensão leitora em adolescentes e jovens adultos com Síndrome de Asperger (SA). O estudo foi conduzido na cidade de Fortaleza, região nordeste do Brasil, com 6 estudantes que já concluíram o Ensino Fundamental I. Mais especificamente, o referido estudo teve seu foco na investigação e melhoria da compreensão leitora de adolescentes e jovens adultos com SA através de um programa de intervenção baseado em estratégias metacognitivas, tendo como base a abordagem conciliadora de leitura. Adotamos o modelo de leitura proposto por Kintsch e Van Dijk (1983), que apresenta a compreensão de leitura como um processo dinâmico, online e estratégico. Além disso, nos baseamos na ideia de Solé (1998) para abordar as estratégias básicas de leitura. Os resultados apresentados neste artigo são um recorte da pesquisa citada, apontam que atividades de ensino com instruções explícitas que sugiram um caminho a ser seguido durante a leitura, servindo como uma espécie de guia de leitura e estimulando o aluno a refletir acerca de seus conhecimentos, de sua compreensão e que o levem ao automonitoramento constituem um meio seguro para minorar as dificuldades de compreensão leitora de pessoas com SA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.499
Threshold uncertainty score0.947

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEntrepalavrasSame topicEducation and Digital TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207