A Comparative Study of Student Organizations in Mainland China and Hong Kong Universities - Based on the Perspective of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Associations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to thoroughly apply the spirit of 18th National Congress of Communist Party of China, strengthening the work of youth under the new situation is the inner requirement of the Communist Youth League. Furthermore, it plays a needing role in doing the youth work under the new situation. As a bridge between college students and society, student organization is an important part of student affairs in universities. In addition, employing the advanced experience in organization management provides theoretical and practical significances to the work of the Communist Youth League in the new situation. Based on the student organization of Mainland and Hong Kong Universities, the project discusses the different performance of Mainland and Hong Kong Universities with the method of comparative study. From the view of student organizations of innovation and entrepreneurship, the project aims to offer the reference to student organizations in Mainland.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it