MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889052689 · doi:10.17665/1676-4285.20176144

Formação audaciosa do enfermeiro-cientista

2018· article· pt· W2889052689 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOnline Brazilian Journal of Nursing · 2018
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealth Education and Validation
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAppropriationSociologyPassionCreativityInternationalizationPedagogyEngineering ethicsEpistemologyPsychologyBusinessPhilosophySocial psychologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A ciência da Enfermagem inclui o manejo do pensamento crítico contemporâneo para a apropriação de inovações da tecnologia. Este aspecto é intrínseco à formação do enfermeiro e nos remete aos binômios ensino-aprendizagem, criatividade-intuição e teoria-prática. O que mais nos importa em tais avanços na configuração do novo pensamento crítico, clínico e científico? As respostas precisam ser: tudo e também. Se parecem ser respostas sucintas, vale lembrar que a Enfermagem, desde sua origem, tem seus marcos conceituais com as complexidades da realidade. Para tanto, democratizar o conhecimento sobre metodologia de pesquisa, desmistificando-a como uma prática exclusiva de poucos, resultaria em despertar a paixão pela pesquisa. Com quem? A nova geração de graduandos deve se conscientizar que no mundo atual da internacionalização da educação universitária, oportunidades existem, mas somente aqueles que estejam prontos para delas se apoderarem podem alcançar conquistas profissionais.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.657
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.147
GPT teacher head0.488
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it