Influence of tool rotational speed on microstructural characteristics of dissimilar Mg alloys during friction stir welding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dissimilar friction stir welding of the AZ80A Mg alloy as the advancing side and the AZ91C Mg alloy as the retreating side was carried out at a constant feed rate of 75 mm/min using a taper cylindrical pin profiled tool at different tool rotational speeds. Defect free welds were produced in the 700–900 rpm rotational speed range. During friction stir welding, extrusion of metal took place in the advancing side and this extruded material was dynamically recrystallized and redeposited on the retreating side. This experimental investigation revealed that friction stir welding leads to the formation of comparatively finer sized grains on the retreating side of the thermo-mechanically affected zone compared to grains in the thermo-mechanically affected zone on the advancing side. Moreover, the heat affected zone of AZ80A possessed fine sized grains compared to the heat affected zone of AZ91C. Additionally, increasing tool rotational speed influenced the tensile strength of the fabricated joints.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".