MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2889076641 · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy565.1163

11637-Tesla Cardiac MRI for Ventricular and Valvular quantitation in healthy volunteers

2018· article· en· W2889076641 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christian Hamilton‐Craig, Daniel Stäeb, Kieran O’Brien, Graham J. Galloway, Markus Barth

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingEjection fractionNuclear medicineCardiologyRegurgitant fractionCardiac magnetic resonance imagingInternal medicineRadiologyHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Ultra-high-field (B0 ≥7 Tesla) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) offers increased resolution, but cardiac imaging requiring ECG gating is significantly impacted from the magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) effect, distorts the ECG trace (1–3). Previously, 7T CMR was constrained to using pulse oximetry for triggering, We explored the technical feasbility of a 7 T research MR scanner using of-the-art ECG trigger algorithm to assess left and right ventricular volumes, aortic and pulmonary valve flow. Methods: 7T CMR scans were performed on 10 healthy volunteers on whole-body research MRI scanner (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) with 8 channel Tx/32 channel Rx cardiac coil (MRI Tools GmbH, Berlin, Germany) under institutional review board approval. Vectorcardiogram ECG was successfully performed using a learning phase outside of the magnetic field, with a trigger algorithm with sufficient accuracy for CMR despite severe ECG signal distortions from the 7T field. Cine CMR was performed after 3rd-order B0 shimming using a high-resolution breath-held ECG-retro-gated segmented two-dimensional spoiled gradient echo sequence, and 2-dimensional phase contrast flow imaging. Analysis was performed using Cmr42 software (Circle CVi, Calgary).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal→Same topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→