Sharif-Human movement instrumentation system (SHARIF-HMIS): Development and validation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The interest in wearable systems among the biomedical engineering and clinical community continues to escalate as technical refinements enhance their potential use for both indoor and outdoor applications. For example, an important wearable technology known as a microelectromechanical system (MEMS) is demonstrating promising applications in the area of biomedical engineering. Accordingly, this study was designed to investigate the Sharif-Human Movement Instrumentation System (SHARIF-HMIS), consisting of inertial measurement units (IMUs), stretchable clothing, and a data logger-all of which can be used outside the controlled environment of a laboratory, thus enhancing its overall utility. This system is lightweight, portable, able to be deliver data for almost 10 h, and features a new data-fusion algorithm using the Kalman filter with an adaptive approach. In specific terms, the data from the system's gyroscope, accelerometer, and magnetometer sensors can be combined to estimate total-body orientation; additionally, the noise level of these sensors can be changed to accommodate faster motions as well as magnetic disturbances. These variations can be incorporated within the extended Kalman filter by changing the parameters of the filter adaptively. In specific terms, the system's interface was developed to acquire data from eighteen IMUs located on the body to collect kinematic data associated with human motion. Meanwhile, a validation test involving one subject performing different shoulder motions was designed to compare data captured by SHARIF-HMIS and the VICON motion-capture system. This validation test demonstrated correlation values of >0.9. Results also confirmed that the output accuracy of the new system's sensor was <0.55, 1.5 and 3.5° for roll, pitch, and yaw directions, respectively. In summary, SHARIF-HMIS successfully collected kinematic data for specific human movements, which has promising implications for a range of sporting, biomedical, and healthcare-related applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".