MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889122124 · doi:10.12968/bjnn.2018.14.4.171

Self-efficacy theory, quality of life and myasthenia gravis self-management

2018· article· en· W2889122124 on OpenAlexaff
Dana C Tigner, James A. Rankin, Karen L. Then

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Neuroscience Nursing · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMyasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyasthenia gravisQuality of life (healthcare)Self-managementMedicineSelf-efficacyCoping (psychology)DiseasePopulationAffect (linguistics)Physical therapyIntensive care medicineClinical psychologyNursingPsychologyPsychotherapistPsychiatryInternal medicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic neuromuscular disease that can negatively affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for patients diagnosed with this dynamic condition. The authors propose that self-management programmes, coordinated and supervised by nurse practitioners, would improve patients' HRQoL. The purpose of this article is to examine the contribution of self-efficacy theory in relation to improvement of HRQoL in patients diagnosed with MG. The authors explore how a self-management programme specifically designed for MG patients would provide the necessary tools to improve self-efficacy and increase their coping skills. Recommendations for future self-management initiatives for this population are discussed. The authors describe the factors that are relevant to self-management in the MG population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.496

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of Neuroscience NursingSame topicMyasthenia Gravis and ThymomaFrench-language works237,207