MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889123613 · doi:10.48084/etasr.2135

Industrial Bearing Fault Detection Using Time-Frequency Analysis

2018· article· en· W2889123613 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Technology & Applied Science Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBearing (navigation)VibrationFault (geology)Time domainFault detection and isolationFrequency domainTime–frequency analysisEngineeringMeasure (data warehouse)Test benchSoftwareComputer scienceElectronic engineeringAcousticsArtificial intelligenceData miningEmbedded systemComputer visionElectrical engineeringPhysicsActuator

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Time-frequency fault detection techniques were applied in this study, for monitoring real life industrial bearing. For this aim, an experimental test bench was developed to emulate the bearing rotating motion and to measure the induced vibration signals. Dedicated software was used to analyze the acquired measurements in the time-frequency domain using several distributions with varying resolution. Results showed that each fault type exhibits a specific behavior in the time-frequency domain, which is exploited in the localization of the faulty component.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.458
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0070.018
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it