Integrating Social Networks with Mobile Device-to-Device Services
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, the rapid growth of traffic has become a serious problem of mobile network operators. For effectively mitigating this traffic explosion problem, there have been many efforts to research on offloading the traffic from cellular links to direct communications among users. In this paper, we are motivated by users' sharing activities, and hence propose the framework of Traffic Offloading assisted by Social network services (SNS) via opportunistic Sharing in mobile social networks (MSNs), TOSS, to offload SNS-based cellular traffic by user-to-user sharing. First, a subset of users who are to receive the same content was selected as initial population depending on their content spreading impacts in the online SNSs and their mobility patterns in the offline MSNs. Then users move, encounter and share the content via opportunistic local connectivity with each other, the content via opportunistic local connectivity with each other, e.g., Bluetooth, Wi-Fi Direct, Device-to-Device in LTE. Individual users have distinct access patterns, which potentially allow TOSS to exploit the user-dependent access delay between the content generation time and each user's access time for content sharing purposes. The traffic offloading and content spreading among users are analyzed by taking into account various options in linking SNS and MSN traces. Four mobility traces and online SNS trace for evaluation are analyzed. An extended evaluation over a large-scale data set are further carried out, and the effectiveness of TOSS is further proved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it