MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A GPS-Based Wander Management System for the Elderly

2018· article· en· W2889158580 on OpenAlexaff
Wen-Yu Chiu, Kuang-Nan Huang, Ying-Chieh Huang, Chi-Kai Huang, Hsin‐Te Wu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobal Positioning SystemPopulation ageingLife expectancyCategorizationComputer scienceGerontologyPopulationDemographyMedicineTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The proportion of elderly population in Taiwan has been on the rise, as ageing society becomes a major issue. According to Taiwan's Ministry of the Interior, in 2016, the average life expectancy was 76.8 years for males and 83.4 years for females, showing a gradual annual rise, which when coupled with decrease in birth rate led to continuous increase in ageing. Prolonged life has resulted in escalated incident rate; usually, in an ageing society, the two main physiological problems that the elderly face are dementia and need for other people's concern. This study employs webpage-obtained GPS (Global Positioning System) records as the main analysis method by utilizing GPS records to analyze and examine elderly behavior so as to understand the elderly's movement positioning. We can also use the GPS records to examine data and determine a movement range; further analysis allows us to categorize movements as either usual or unusual activities in order to explore user behavior. Our system analyzes early behavior to further understand the elderly's message behavior and motivation and then issue warning or response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207