MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889174346 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2018.8447640

Evaluating the Impact of Phasor Measurement Units on the Accuracy of State Estimation

2018· article· en· W2889174346 on OpenAlexaff
Hossam Mosbah, Mo. El-Hawary

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhasorEstimatorUnits of measurementComputer scienceMultilayer perceptronGridPerceptronSet (abstract data type)AlgorithmState (computer science)Process (computing)VoltageElectric power systemElectronic engineeringPower (physics)Artificial neural networkArtificial intelligenceEngineeringMathematicsElectrical engineeringStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PMUs are viewed as one of the most vital measurement devices in future of electric grid. PMUs devices can provide synchronized phasor measurement of voltages and currents from broadly scattered areas in an electric power grid. A hybrid Multilayer Perceptron NN-Stochastic Fractal Search (MLP-SFS) algorithm is being proposed in rectangular coordinates to solve hybrid state estimator problem. Hybrid SE is defined based on its measurement set which consists of traditional as well as synchronized measurements. The approach classifies the process into two steps. The first step, Multilayer Perceptron NN is used to compute the initial estimated states. The second step, SFS is implemented to acquire the final estimated states. This hybrid technique is used to improve the accuracy of state estimation. The size of PMUs is gradually increased by adding them to the conventional measurement set. Six cases are tested to show the impact of PMUs on the accuracy. The application of the hybrid technique is illustrated on IEEE 14, 30, and 57-bus systems. The Performance of MLPN-SFS is compared to MLP and SFS individually.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207