MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889202486 · doi:10.1097/sap.0000000000001601

Course Review

2018· article· en· W2889202486 on OpenAlexaff
Juan Enrique Berner, Ioannis Kyriazidis

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Plastic Surgery · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Canadian institutionsKellogg's (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMagnificationCourse (navigation)Plastic surgeryMobile deviceMedical physicsPhysical examinationSurgeryGeneral surgeryMedical educationArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Dermoscopy is a physical examination technique that combines the use of illumination and magnification, provided by a handheld device, to scrutinize skin lesions. Its use increases the diagnostic accuracy for the trained operator, providing more information for making better decisions for the management of skin cancer. The “International Dermoscopy Course for Plastic Surgeons” aims to train plastic surgery trainees and consultants in the use of this technique. This 1-day, lecture-based course is held 4 times a year in the city of Oxford, United Kingdom, at a cost of £250 (US $340). This article intends to provide a review of this course.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Plastic SurgerySame topicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementFrench-language works237,207