MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889209263 · doi:10.1049/iet-cds.2018.5070

Design of odd <i>n</i> th‐order elliptic high‐pass filters employing OTRAs

2018· article· es· W2889209263 on OpenAlex
Chun‐Ming Chang, Shu‐Hui Tu, M.N.S. Swamy, Ahmed M. Soliman

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Circuits Devices & Systems · 2018
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResistorRealisationFilter (signal processing)SpiceOrder (exchange)MathematicsLow-pass filterAmplifierAmplitudeMathematical analysisComputer sciencePhysicsElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringBandwidth (computing)Quantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two new analytical synthesis methods are proposed for synthesising an n th odd‐order elliptic high‐pass (HP) filter using operational trans‐resistance amplifiers (OTRAs). The analytical synthesis scheme is based on the assumption of infinite trans‐resistance R m for the OTRA. The H‐spice simulations of the realised elliptic third‐order HP filters show that the realisation using less number of OTRAs has a performance better than that which uses more number of OTRAs, as is to be expected in view of the assumption that R m is infinite, when in fact it is finite in practice. However, it is shown that by slightly adjusting a single resistor, the amplitude–frequency response can be made close to the theoretical response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it