MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889212873 · doi:10.1109/icphm.2018.8449003

Time series modeling of vibration signals from a gearbox under varying speed and load condition

2018· article· en· W2889212873 on OpenAlexaff
Yuejian Chen, Xihui Liang, Ming J. Zuo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVibrationSeries (stratigraphy)Control theory (sociology)Rotation (mathematics)Regression analysisMetric (unit)Computer scienceLegendre polynomialsTime seriesSIGNAL (programming language)MathematicsEngineeringArtificial intelligenceMachine learningAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate modeling of the baseline vibration signals generated from a healthy gearbox is critical to the success of time series model-based condition monitoring approach (TSMBA). Gearboxes often operate under varying rotation speed and load conditions, which makes the vibration signals non-stationary. It is challenging to accurately model such signals. Existing auto-regression models with exogenous variables (ARX) cannot model the time-varying spectral contents properly due to the limitation on its model structure. Aiming at improving the modeling accuracy, this paper proposes a functional series - operating condition dependent auto-regression (FS-OCAR) model. Legendre polynomials are used to describe the dependence between the operating condition and auto-regression parameters. FS-OCAR is validated using simulation signals from a fixed-shaft gearbox. The modeling accuracy is measured by calculating goodness-of-fit metric and mean squared error of the modeling residuals. Comparisons show that the proposed FS-OCAR outperforms the ARX.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.392
Threshold uncertainty score0.311

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGear and Bearing Dynamics AnalysisFrench-language works237,207