User Association in Cloud RANs with Massive MIMO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper studies a resource allocation problem where a set of users within a specific region is served by cloud radio access network (C-RAN) structure consisting of a set of base-band units (BBUs) connected to a set of radio remote heads (RRHs) equipped with a large number of antennas via limited capacity front-haul links. User association to each RRH, BBU and front-haul link is essential to achieve high rates for cell-edge users under network limitations. We introduce two types of optimization variables to formulate this resource allocation problem: (i) C-RAN user association factor (UAF) including RRH, BBU and front-haul allocation for each user and (ii) power allocation vector. The formulated optimization problem is non-convex with high computational complexity. An efficient two-level iterative approach is proposed. The higher level consists of two steps where, in each step, one of these two optimization variables is fixed to derive the other. At the lower level, by applying different transformations and convexification techniques, the optimization problem in each step is broken down into a sequence of geometric programming (GP) problems to be solved by the successive convex approximation (SCA). Simulation results reveal the effectiveness of the proposed approach to increase the total throughput of network, specifically for cell-edge users. It outperforms the traditional user association approach, in which, each user is first assigned to the RRH with the largest average value of signal strength, and then, based on this fixed user association, front-haul link association and power allocation are optimized.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".