MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889242041 · doi:10.1162/dram_r_00779

<i>Performance Studies in Canada</i>

2018· article· en· W2889242041 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tracy C. Davis

Bibliographic record

VenueTDR/The Drama Review · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationQueen (butterfly)Art historyPerformance studiesThe artsDramaArtLibrary scienceHistoryMedia studiesVisual artsSociologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

September 01 2018 Performance Studies in Canada Performance Studies in Canada. Edited by LauraLevin and MarlisSchweitzer. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2017; 448 pp.; illustrations. $120.00 cloth, $39.95 paper, e-book available. Tracy C. Davis Tracy C. Davis Tracy C. Davis is Barber Professor of Performing Arts at Northwestern University. Uncle Tom’s Cabins: The Transnational History of America’s Most Mutable Book, edited with Stefka Mihaylova, was published by Michigan University Press in March 2018. tcdavis@northwestern.edu Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Author and Article Information Tracy C. Davis Tracy C. Davis is Barber Professor of Performing Arts at Northwestern University. Uncle Tom’s Cabins: The Transnational History of America’s Most Mutable Book, edited with Stefka Mihaylova, was published by Michigan University Press in March 2018. tcdavis@northwestern.edu Online Issn: 1531-4715 Print Issn: 1054-2043 ©2018 New York University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology2018New York University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology TDR/The Drama Review (2018) 62 (3 (239)): 175–176. https://doi.org/10.1162/dram_r_00779 Cite Icon Cite Permissions Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Search Site Citation Tracy C. Davis; Performance Studies in Canada. TDR/The Drama Review 2018; 62: 3 (239), 175–176. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/dram_r_00779 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsTDR/The Drama Review Search Advanced Search This content is only available as a PDF. ©2018 New York University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology2018New York University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.013
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0560.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTDR/The Drama ReviewSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207