MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889242041 · doi:10.1162/dram_r_00779

<i>Performance Studies in Canada</i>

2018· article· en· W2889242041 on OpenAlex
Tracy C. Davis

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTDR/The Drama Review · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationQueen (butterfly)Art historyPerformance studiesThe artsDramaArtLibrary scienceHistoryMedia studiesVisual artsSociologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

September 01 2018 Performance Studies in Canada Performance Studies in Canada. Edited by LauraLevin and MarlisSchweitzer. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2017; 448 pp.; illustrations. $120.00 cloth, $39.95 paper, e-book available. Tracy C. Davis Tracy C. Davis Tracy C. Davis is Barber Professor of Performing Arts at Northwestern University. Uncle Tom’s Cabins: The Transnational History of America’s Most Mutable Book, edited with Stefka Mihaylova, was published by Michigan University Press in March 2018. tcdavis@northwestern.edu Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Author and Article Information Tracy C. Davis Tracy C. Davis is Barber Professor of Performing Arts at Northwestern University. Uncle Tom’s Cabins: The Transnational History of America’s Most Mutable Book, edited with Stefka Mihaylova, was published by Michigan University Press in March 2018. tcdavis@northwestern.edu Online Issn: 1531-4715 Print Issn: 1054-2043 ©2018 New York University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology2018New York University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology TDR/The Drama Review (2018) 62 (3 (239)): 175–176. https://doi.org/10.1162/dram_r_00779 Cite Icon Cite Permissions Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Search Site Citation Tracy C. Davis; Performance Studies in Canada. TDR/The Drama Review 2018; 62: 3 (239), 175–176. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/dram_r_00779 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsTDR/The Drama Review Search Advanced Search This content is only available as a PDF. ©2018 New York University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology2018New York University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.222
Threshold uncertainty score0.519

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it