MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889257037 · doi:10.14447/jnmes.v17i1.443

Microstructure Properties of ZnO/ Indium Tin Oxide and ZnO/CuInSe2 grown by Electrochemical Deposition

2013· article· en· W2889257037 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hsiang Chen, Yih-Min Yeh, Yun‐Ti Chen, Chian You Chen, Sheng-Hsin Wang, Li-Chen Chu, Ren Guei Ueng, Hsi-Wen Yu, Sheng-Ting Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical Systems · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCopper-based nanomaterials and applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndium tin oxideSubstrate (aquarium)Materials scienceMicrostructureScanning electron microscopeTriethanolamineIndiumLayer (electronics)Chemical engineeringSolar cellDeposition (geology)Electron microprobeThin filmTinElectrochemistryZincMetallurgyNanotechnologyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OptoelectronicsChemistryComposite materialElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this research, we grew a ZnO film as a buffer layer on indium tin oxide (ITO) substrates and CuInSe2/ITO (CIS/ITO) substrates by electrochemical deposition. To examine material quality of ZnO films, multiple material and optical analyses including scanning electron microscope images, electron probe microanalyzer images, UV-VIS, and x-ray diffraction were conducted. The results indicate that an appropriate amount of H2O2 might enhance the growth of ZnO films on the ITO substrate. Furthermore, triethanolamine addition might suppress the reaction between KCl and the CIS substrate to enhance the growth of the ZnO film on the CIS substrate. The ZnO/CIS structure may replace the toxic CdS/CIS structure for the further development for the CIS solar cell.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.925

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical SystemsSame topicCopper-based nanomaterials and applicationsFrench-language works237,207