MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889282955 · doi:10.1093/nar/gky785

Programmable T7-based synthetic transcription factors

2018· article· en· W2889282955 on OpenAlexafffund
Brendan J. Hussey, David R. McMillen

Bibliographic record

VenueNucleic Acids Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsImpactUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada First Research Excellence Fund
KeywordsBiologySynthetic biologyRNA polymeraseTranscription (linguistics)General transcription factorBacterial transcriptionTranscription factor II DRNA polymerase IIComputational biologyPolymeraseTranscription factorSigma factorEukaryotic transcriptionGeneticsDNACell biologyEscherichia coliPromoterGene expressionGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite recent progress on synthetic transcription factor generation in eukaryotes, there remains a need for high-activity bacterial versions of these systems. In synthetic biology applications, it is useful for transcription factors to have two key features: they should be orthogonal (influencing only their own targets, with minimal off-target effects), and programmable (able to be directed to a wide range of user-specified transcriptional start sites). The RNA polymerase of the bacteriophage T7 has a number of appealing properties for synthetic biological designs: it can produce high transcription rates; it is a compact, single-subunit polymerase that has been functionally expressed in a variety of organisms; and its viral origin reduces the connection between its activity and that of its host's transcriptional machinery. We have created a system where a T7 RNA polymerase is recruited to transcriptional start sites by DNA binding proteins, either directly or bridged through protein-protein interactions, yielding a modular and programmable system for strong transcriptional activation of multiple orthogonal synthetic transcription factor variants in Escherichia coli. To our knowledge this is the first exogenous, programmable activator system in bacteria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.150
Threshold uncertainty score0.460

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNucleic Acids ResearchSame topicCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringFrench-language works237,207