Coarse-grained residue-based models of disordered protein condensates: utility and limitations of simple charge pattern parameters
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biomolecular condensates undergirded by phase separations of proteins and nucleic acids serve crucial biological functions. To gain physical insights into their genetic basis, we study how liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) depends on their sequence charge patterns using a continuum Langevin chain model wherein each amino acid residue is represented by a single bead. Charge patterns are characterized by the "blockiness" measure κ and the "sequence charge decoration" (SCD) parameter. Consistent with random phase approximation (RPA) theory and lattice simulations, LLPS propensity as characterized by critical temperature Tcr* increases with increasingly negative SCD for a set of sequences showing a positive correlation between κ and -SCD. Relative to RPA, the simulated sequence-dependent variation in Tcr* is often-though not always-smaller, whereas the simulated critical volume fractions are higher. However, for a set of sequences exhibiting an anti-correlation between κ and -SCD, the simulated Tcr*'s are quite insensitive to either parameter. Additionally, we find that blocky sequences that allow for strong electrostatic repulsion can lead to coexistence curves with upward concavity as stipulated by RPA, but the LLPS propensity of a strictly alternating charge sequence was likely overestimated by RPA and lattice models because interchain stabilization of this sequence requires spatial alignments that are difficult to achieve in real space. These results help delineate the utility and limitations of the charge pattern parameters and of RPA, pointing to further efforts necessary for rationalizing the newly observed subtleties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it