MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889288982 · doi:10.14447/jnmes.v15i1.87

Annealing Effects on the Properties of Electrodeposited CdSSe Thin Films

2011· article· en· W2889288982 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
T. Mahalingam, S. Rajendran, G. Ravi, Luis Ixtlilco, P.J. Sebastián

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical Systems · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicChalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScanning electron microscopeCrystalliteThin filmMaterials scienceDiffractometerAnnealing (glass)Refractive indexBand gapTransmittanceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Molar absorptivityOpticsOptoelectronicsChemistryComposite materialNanotechnologyMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of post heat treatment on structural, morphological and optical properties of electrodeposited CdSSe solid solution thin films were studied using X-ray diffractometer (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and UV-Vis-NIR spectrophotometer, respectively. X-ray diffraction patterns revealed that polycrystalline nature with hexagonal structure of CdSSe thin films. Also the microstructural properties are calculated tends to increase and the face centred hexagonal orientation of CdSSe thin film is enhanced significantly by increasing the annealing temperature. Scanning electron microscopic images revealed that the hexagonal shaped grains are occupying the entire surface of the film. The optical transmittance and absorption spectra were recorded in the range 400 to1100 nm. The band gap of the CdSSe thin films was found to decrease from 2.0 eV to 1.8 eV due to annealing temperature. The real part of the complex refractive index (n) and the imaginary part extinction coefficient (k) were calculated before and after annealing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.628

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical SystemsSame topicChalcogenide Semiconductor Thin FilmsFrench-language works237,207