MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889289504 · doi:10.1109/lmwc.2018.2864880

400-to-800-MHz GaAs pHEMT-Based Wideband LNA for Radio-Astronomy Antenna-Array Feed

2018· article· en· W2889289504 on OpenAlexafffund
Thisara Kulatunga, Leonid Belostotski, J.W. Haslett

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsCMC MicrosystemsUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsWidebandLow-noise amplifierAmplifierElectrical engineeringHigh-electron-mobility transistorNoise figurePhysicsTransistorBandwidth (computing)OptoelectronicsElectronic engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringVoltageTelecommunicationsCMOS

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This letter presents the design of a two-stage 400-to-800-MHz GaAs pseudomorphic high-electron-mobility transistor wideband low-noise amplifier (LNA) to upgrade an aperture synthesis radio telescope. The first stage is based on an inductive-source-degenerated amplifier topology, uses a low voltage supply, and utilizes an intrinsic input-transistor gate-drain feedback to improve the LNA bandwidth and gain. The final stage, a common-source amplifier, provides 50-Ω match and increases the gain. Employing matching via intrinsic feedback and a low-voltage supply, the LNA exhibits gain (S21) from 41.1 to 43.3 dB, a minimum input-referred 1-dB compression point of -32.8 dBm, and a noise figure from 0.26 to 0.34 dB over the 400-to-800-MHz band. A future antennaarray feed with such LNAs is expected to exhibit 18.8-26.3 K beam-referred noise temperatures. The LNA consumes 406 mW from a 1.4-V supply.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Microwave and Wireless Components LettersSame topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207