MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889297752 · doi:10.1109/iwcmc.2018.8450418

Utilization of Wavelet Packet Sensor De-noising for Accurate Positioning in Intelligent Road Services

2018· article· en· W2889297752 on OpenAlexaff
Amr S. El-Wakeel, Aboelmagd Noureldin, Hossam S. Hassanein, Nizar Zorba

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGNSS applicationsComputer scienceMultipath propagationReal-time computingInertial navigation systemOperabilityWaveletGNSS augmentationSatellite systemNetwork packetGlobal Positioning SystemEmbedded systemTelecommunicationsInertial frame of referenceComputer networkChannel (broadcasting)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, smart cities functionality and management have captured notable consideration. Owing to the rapid development in the information and communication technologies (ICT), various applications and services are highly engaged in the cities' operation. Specifically, intelligent road services as traffic management, driver behavior assessment and crowdsensing based road condition monitoring contribute towards better operability. To sustain decent performance of these applications, accurate and continuous positioning is an essential concern. Generally, Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers are vulnerable to partial or complete outages due to multipath or signal blockage. Consequently, inertial navigation systems integrated with GNSS receivers are affected by inertial sensors noises and biases. In this paper, we apply wavelet packet de-nosing to eliminate noises of the Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) grade inertial sensors. Afterwards, we integrate the de-noised reduced inertial sensor system (RISS) with GNSS receivers in real road experiment to assess the system performance. In addition, we show the significance ofthe proposed integration over the conventional one during multiple GNSS outages under various driving scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.581
Threshold uncertainty score0.325

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207