MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889310951

PHOTOSYNTHETIC ADJUSTMENTS OF AMARANTHUS VARIETIES IN RESPONSE TO GROWTH IRRADIANCE

2018· dissertation· en· W2889310951 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Elena Benic

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
KeywordsIrradiancePhotosynthesisHorticulturePhotosynthetic efficiencyBotanyBiologyMathematicsEnvironmental sciencePhysicsOptics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Increased concern of food security has created a demand for crops that exhibit high yields under conditions that require a minimal input of resources, such as light. Amaranthus is a C4 plant that has multiple uses, including that of a food source in many parts of the world. The objective of this research was to evaluate the photosynthetic performance of red and green vegetable varieties of Amaranthus blitum grown under high light (HL; 500 µmol m-2 s-1) photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) and low light (LL; 70 µmol m-2 s-1 PPFD). Under HL growth irradiance, the red variety accumulated more biomass than the green variety before flowering. This was accompanied by a 1.2-fold increase of photosynthetic efficiency, a 1.5-fold increase of photosynthetic capacity (maximal rates of O2 evolution), a 1.5-fold increase of dark respiration rate, a 1.3- fold increase in light compensation point and a 1.7-fold increase of light saturation point. These values were supported by a 2.5- and 2.6-fold higher content of chlorophyll and carotenoids, respectively. A 4.7-fold greater betalain content was also observed. In addition, exposure to a photoinhibitory irradiance (1450 µmol m-2 s-1 PPFD) at 2°C for 4 hours demonstrated the red variety exhibited increased tolerance to photoinhibition in comparison to the green variety when measured at the level of maximal photochemical efficiency of photosystem II. Further, this may be a result of the screening of light and shielding of chloroplasts by betalains that accumulate predominantly in the abaxial mesophyll and supported by a 1.2-fold increase in the red variety lower mesophyll cells thickness than in the green variety, leading to a thicker leaf. The granal index in bundle sheath cells under high light irradiance in the red variety was 2.0-fold greater than in the green variety, supported by 3.1-fold greater ratio of the length of appressed/non-appressed thylakoids and a 2.0-fold increase in thylakoids/granum. These results suggest that under HL growth irradiance, the granal index and stackness (thylakoids/granum) enhances photosynthetic efficiency and capacity. In contrast, under LL growth irradiance both varieties performed photosynthetically similarly. Collectively, these results indicate that the red variety possesses a greater photoacclimatory capacity than the green variety under HL growth irradiance, whereas neither variety expressed an advantage under the LL growth irradiance in this study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlant Physiology and Cultivation StudiesFrench-language works237,207