MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889339353 · doi:10.14447/jnmes.v14i4.100

Electropolymerization of Indole-3-acetic Acid on Glassy Carbon Electrode for Sensitive Detection of Nitrite

2011· article· en· W2889339353 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yu Jun Yang, Xiangle Yin, Zhixin Yu, Yapin Du, Weikun Li

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical Systems · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicConducting polymers and applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNitriteDetection limitOverpotentialAmperometryElectrochemistryAcetic acidElectrodeGlassy carbonChemistryNuclear chemistryInorganic chemistryChromatographyCyclic voltammetryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Highly uniform and adhesive films of poly(indole-3-acetic acid) (p-IAA) were fabricated on the glassy carbon electrode (GCE) by electropolymerization of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). The p-IAA modified GCE (p-IAA/GCE) was constructed to develop a promising amperometric sensor for the sensitive determination of nitrite. Field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM) and electrochemical techniques were used for the surface characterization of the modified electrode. It was demonstrated that p-IAA modified GCE (p-IAA/GCE) exhibited remarkable electrocatalytic activity towards the oxidation of nitrite with obvious reduction of overpotential. Under the optimal conditions, the linear range for the detection of nitrite was 5.0×10-7 to 5.0×10-4 M with a high sensitivity of 0.105 AM-1, and a low detection limit of 1.0×10-7 M (S/N = 3). The influence of various anions and cations on the nitrite detection has been studied. The proposed method was successfully applied in the detection of nitrite in sausage samples, and the results were consistent with those obtained by UV-vis spectrophotometric methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical SystemsSame topicConducting polymers and applicationsFrench-language works237,207