MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889355038 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2018.8447838

A Nonparametric Probability Distribution Model for Short-Term Wind Power Prediction Error

2018· article· en· W2889355038 on OpenAlexaffabout
Benyamin Khorramdel, Hossein Khorramdel, Alireza Zare, Nima Safari, Hossein Sangrody, C. Y. Chung

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWind powerKernel density estimationKurtosisNonparametric statisticsComputer scienceSkewnessParametric statisticsWind power forecastingModel selectionProbability distributionParametric modelPower (physics)Electric power systemStatisticsMathematicsArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate wind power prediction error (WPPE) modeling is of high importance in power systems with large scale wind power generation containing high level of uncertainty. Since WPPE cannot be entirely removed, providing its accurate probability distribution model can assist power system operators in mitigating its negative effects on decision making conditions. In this paper, unlike previous related works, a nonparametric model is presented using kernel density estimation (KDE) with an efficient bandwidth (BW) selection technique called “advanced plug-in” technique. The utilized BW selection technique enables KDE to accurately estimate important features of WPPE distribution, e.g., fat tails, high skewness and kurtosis. The proposed WPPE modeling approach is simulated using one-year time series of real wind power and corresponding predicted values for 1-hour look-ahead time. The efficacy of the proposed WPPE model is depicted using Centennial wind farm dataset in south of Saskatchewan province in Canada. Results show that parametric distribution models like Normal, Stable, and so on may not properly model the uncertainty of WPPE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Load and Power ForecastingFrench-language works237,207