MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889385139 · doi:10.1109/icca.2018.8444262

Prescribed Performance Constrained Nonlinear Robust Control for Close Formation Flight

2018· article· en· W2889385139 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft Dynamics and Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)EstimatorBaseline (sea)AerodynamicsNonlinear systemController (irrigation)Robust controlConvergence (economics)Computer scienceTransient (computer programming)Robustness (evolution)EngineeringControl (management)MathematicsArtificial intelligenceAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel robust nonlinear control algorithm for close formation flight with guaranteed prescribed transient performance. The proposed control algorithm is composed of a constrained baseline controller and an uncertainty and disturbance estimator. Some performance specifications will be ensured by the baseline controller, such as the maximum overshoots, the least convergence rates, and the maximum steady tracking errors. Based on the baseline controller, an uncertainty and disturbance estimator is established to compensate for any model uncertainties and formation aerodynamic disturbances within the nonlinear aircraft model in close formation. The feasibility and efficiency of the proposed control algorithm are finally validated by numerical simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpacecraft Dynamics and ControlFrench-language works237,207