MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889389406 · doi:10.1109/iwcmc.2018.8450492

Power Allocation for SCMA Downlink Systems Based on Maximum Energy Efficiency

2018· article· en· W2889389406 on OpenAlexaff
Yiteng Huang, Shuai Han, Shizeng Guo, Weixiao Meng, Cheng Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEfficient energy useTelecommunications linkResource allocationMathematical optimizationPower (physics)Energy (signal processing)Code division multiple accessResource management (computing)Quality of serviceDistributed computingComputer networkEngineeringMathematicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sparse code multiple access(SCMA) is a novel kind of non-orthogonal multiple access technology which has the advantages of supporting more connections, low time delay and overcomes the near-far effect in CDMA system. In this paper we propose power allocation algorithms for SCMA downlink systems to maximize the energy efficiency. Since the resource allocation problem is non-convex, we employ the Lagrange dual decomposition method and Dinkelbach theory to solve the optimization problem. Our results shows that energy efficiency can be improved significantly by adopting optimal power allocation method. The SCMA maximum energy efficiency system save more energy in the condition of satisfying the user QoS requirement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207