MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889422536 · doi:10.14447/jnmes.v21i3.455

Optimal Performance Evaluation of Energy Efficient Residential Air Conditioning System with Nanofluid-based Intercooler using Taguchi-based Response Surface Methodology

2018· article· en· W2889422536 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Balaji Navaneethakrishnan, N. Nithyanandan, R. Adalarasan, M. Santhanakumar, P. Suresh Mohan Kumar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical Systems · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanofluidIntercoolerTaguchi methodsAir conditioningOrthogonal arrayMaterials scienceThermodynamicsVolumetric flow rateMechanical engineeringProcess engineeringEnvironmental scienceGas compressorChemical engineeringComposite materialEngineeringNanotechnologyPhysicsNanoparticle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Air conditioning is viewed as a major energy consuming area in domestic and industrial applications. However energy conservation is effectively possible in air conditioners by employing an intercooler with nanofluids, which can consequently reduce the compressor load. This paper presents an investigative report on the performance of proposed energy efficient air conditioning system. A binary mixture of ethylene glycol (C2H6O2) and water is used as the base fluid in the shell and coil type heat exchanger (SCHE). The volume concentration of C2H6O2 in base fluid, type of suspended nano particles (Al2O3 and MgO), flow rate of nanofluid at shell side of intercooler and the volume fraction of nano particles are chosen for experimentation designed using Taguchi L18 orthogonal array. The coefficient of performance (COP) of the nanofluid-based domestic air conditioner is estimated as the performance index (response). Quadratic model and response surface plots are generated to observe the effects of inputs on the COP. The nano particles of MgO (0.75%v/v), suspended in a binary mixture with 28.65% C2H6O2 is found to improve the system performance (COP) at a nanofluid flow rate of 2.42 LPM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.438
Threshold uncertainty score0.650

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical SystemsSame topicHeat Transfer and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207