MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Surface Recombination Velocity Imaging of HF-Etched Si Wafers Using Dynamic Heterodyne Lock-In Carrierography

2018· article· en· W2889453895 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDiffusion and defect data, solid state data. Part B, Solid state phenomena/Solid state phenomena · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon and Solar Cell Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaferHeterodyne (poetry)Materials sciencePassivationEtching (microfabrication)Hydrofluoric acidOptoelectronicsOpticsFabricationIsotropic etchingNanotechnologyAcousticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Surface electronic quality of wet-cleaned Si wafers was characterized quantitatively and all-optically via spatially-resolved surface recombination velocity (SRV) imaging using InGaAs-camera-based dynamic heterodyne lock-in carrierography. Six samples undergone four different hydrofluoric special-solution etching conditions were tested, their SRV distributions at different queue times after the hydrogen passivation processes were obtained, and a quantitative assessment of their surface electronic quality was made based on the evolution behavior of globally-integrated information from the SRV images. The data acquisition time for an SRV image with full camera pixel resolution was about 3 min. The methodology introduced here is promising for in-line nondestructive testing/evaluation and quality control at different fabrication/manufacturing stages in the electronic industry. Keywords: heterodyne lock-in carrierography, surface recombination velocity, quantitative imaging, HF etching, Si wafers

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.818
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it