MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889472245 · doi:10.14745/ccdr.v40i04a02

CATMAT Statement on International Travellers and Typhoid – a welcome development

2014· editorial· en· W2889472245 on OpenAlexaffvenue
I Neumann, Alonso Carrasco‐Labra, Gordon Guyatt

Bibliographic record

VenueCanada Communicable Disease Report · 2014
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical practice guidelines implementation
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTyphoid feverStatement (logic)Political scienceMedicineVirologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An increasing number of organizations worldwide are updating their methods and standards to produce trustworthy clinical guidelines (1-6).In keeping with this welcome development, the Committee to Advise on Tropical Medicine and Travel (CATMAT) has used, for the first time, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to guideline development in its update of the Statement on International Travellers and Typhoid (7).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.023
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.092
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.122

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0230.092
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0210.030
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanada Communicable Disease ReportSame topicClinical practice guidelines implementationFrench-language works237,207