Synthesis, Crystal Structure, and Fluorescence Properties of Dinuclear and Tetranuclear Zinc(II) Complexes Based on 2-(2’-Hydroxyphenyl)-2-oxazoline
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two new zinc(II) complexes have been prepared by reaction of 2-(2’-Hydroxyphenyl)-2-oxazoline(Hoz) with Zn(acac)2 and ZnCl2 respectively. The complexes are characterized by IR and X-ray crystallography. Complex 1 is dinuclear zinc structure bridged by the oxygen atoms from oz- ligand and acac- ligand as terminal chelating ligand. Complex 2 is tetranuclear zinc structure bridged by both μ2-oxygen from oz- ligand and μ3-methoxide. 1 crystalizes in P21 space group with crystallographic parameters: a=9.3842Å19), b=13.5840 Å30), c=11.1380 Å20), β=96.250°(30). 2 crystalizes in P-1 space group with crystallographic parameters: a=9.5517Å(19), b=11.1234Å(22), c=11.1826Å(22), α=102.820°(30), β=114.988°(30), γ=100.806°(30). The UV absorption and fluorescence emission spectra are measured on the methanol solution and solid state of complex 1 and it shows strong luminescence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".