MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Case Report: Post obstructive pulmonary edema (POPE) Type II following elective adenotonsillectomy requiring novel use of high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV)

2018· preprint· en· W2889503064 on OpenAlexaff
Joanna J. Moser, Meghan O’Connell, Debbie L. McAllister

Bibliographic record

VenueF1000Research · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalRoyal Jubilee HospitalFoothills Medical CentreUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePulmonary edemaAirway obstructionVentilation (architecture)ComplicationAirwayHigh-frequency ventilationAnesthesiaMechanical ventilationSurgeryInternal medicineLung

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This case report describes a previously healthy 14 year-old patient undergoing elective outpatient adenotonsillectomy that was complicated by acute postoperative pulmonary edema requiring 12 hours of high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) support. We describe the clinical findings that led us to this rare diagnosis and management of post obstructive pulmonary edema (POPE) Type II, a rare but recognized complication following the surgical relief of an upper airway obstruction. This case is unique in that no previously published case report or review of POPE Type II has described the need for HFOV support.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.302
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueF1000ResearchSame topicRespiratory Support and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207