Constraints to implementing guidelines for the identification, assessment, and management of childhood obesity in the clinical care setting: Prevention and treatment framework
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The "Pathway for the Identification, Assessment and Management of Overweight and Obese Children & Youth" was developed to support healthcare providers in identifying and treating childhood obesity in British Columbia (Canada). PURPOSE: The study aimed to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of using the Pathway in clinical settings. METHODS: 13 healthcare providers (7 family physicians, 2 pediatricians, 2 registered dietitians, and 2 nurse practitioners) assessed the Pathway and participated in semi-structured interviews in 2015. A direct constant comparative analysis guided the coding of the interviews in the NVivo 9 software. RESULTS: The interviews uncovered the complexity of factors that influenced practices of healthcare providers. Three broad issues were identified as required if the "Pathway" were to be used and fully implemented in practices. First, the "Pathway" needs to be modified in terms of how it is presented and explained and be supplemented with appropriate documentation and resources for its implementation, Second, the constraints that limit implementation need to be addressed and should include a focus on both individual (i.e., the healthcare providers themselves) and environmental (i.e., factors within and outside of providers' organizations) factors. Lastly, there is a need to establish processes and/or infrastructure for adapting the "Pathway" to the local context as resources and supports vary by organizations and regions. CONCLUSION: Healthcare providers should be involved in screening and managing childhood obesity. Addressing the challenges found in this study will enable healthcare providers to take a more active role in addressing childhood obesity in their day to day practices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".