MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889527568 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2018.8447756

Survey of Identity-Based Attacks Detection Techniques in Wireless Networks Using Received Signal Strength

2018· article· en· W2889527568 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSecurity in Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRSSComputer scienceWirelessIdentity (music)Wireless networkComputer securityComputer networkCryptographySignal strengthScale (ratio)TelecommunicationsWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The identity-based attacks are easy to launch in wireless networks with growing number of devices connected via wireless medium these kind of attacks are imminent. The standard cryptography procedures are resource intensive and do not provide adequate protection in some cases. The studies of Received Signal Strength (RSS) has shown promise in identifying and detecting identity-based attacks. The researchers have proposed different RSS based techniques. However, each solution has some shortcomings that make it impractical for the large-scale constrained-environment wireless network. In this paper, identity-based attacks detection techniques utilizing RSS are reviewed to see if any suitable solution exists that can be adopted or modified for large-scale critical infrastructure ecosystem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.791
Threshold uncertainty score0.920

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSecurity in Wireless Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207