MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889534785 · doi:10.1177/1352458518798048

gMS-Classifier1 does not predict disability progression in multiple sclerosis

2018· letter· en· W2889534785 on OpenAlexaff
Johannis A van Rossum, Joep Killestein, Luisa María Villar, Peter Riskind, Mark S. Freedman, Charlotte E. Teunissen

Bibliographic record

VenueMultiple Sclerosis Journal · 2018
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiple sclerosisMedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationClinical neurologyPsychologyNeurosciencePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Several clinical, immunological and radiological biomarkers have been shown to predict the disease course of multiple sclerosis (MS).One potential serum marker is the gMS-Classifier1, which is composed of IgM anti-Glc antibodies, namely anti-GAGA 2,3,4 and 6. Previous work demonstrated that the gMS-Classifier1 could not predict early conversion to clinically definite MS in a cohort of clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) patients, but predicted Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) progression. Significance, however, was dependent on covariates, and confirmation in an independent study was required. The aim of this study was to test if the gMS-Classifier1 could predict early disability progression in a large multicenter cohort of patients with CIS or relapse-onset MS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.166
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMultiple Sclerosis JournalSame topicMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207