MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889537237 · doi:10.14778/3229863.3236267

ConTPL

2018· article· en· W2889537237 on OpenAlexaff
Yang Cao, Li Xiong, Masatoshi Yoshikawa, Yonghui Xiao, Si Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the VLDB Endowment · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Institute of General Medical Sciences
KeywordsDifferential privacyComputer scienceBounding overwatchData stream miningThe InternetInformation privacyVisualizationData miningComputer securityArtificial intelligenceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In many real-world systems, such as Internet of Thing, sensitive data streams are collected and analyzed continually. To protect privacy, a number of mechanisms are designed to achieve ϵ-differential privacy for processing sensitive streaming data, whose privacy loss is considered to be rigorously controlled within a given parameter ϵ . However, most of the existing studies do not consider the effect of temporal correlations among the continuously generated data on the privacy loss. Our recent work reveals that, the privacy loss of a traditional DP mechanism (e.g., Laplace mechanism) may not be bounded by ϵ due to temporal correlations. We call such unexpected privacy loss Temporal Privacy Leakage (TPL). In this demonstration, we design a system, ConTPL, which is able to automatically convert an existing differentially private streaming data release mechanism into one bounding TPL within a specified level. ConTPL also provides an interactive interface and real-time visualization to help data curator to understand and explore the effect of different parameters on TPL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesOpen science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.705
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0290.070
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the VLDB EndowmentSame topicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataFrench-language works237,207