Phacidiaceae endophytes of <i>Picea rubens</i> in Eastern Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
More than 100 fungal endophyte strains belonging to the family Phacidiaceae were isolated from surface-sterilized Picea rubens Sarg. needles collected from the Acadian Forest Region in New Brunswick, Canada. The strains were characterized morphologically by their asexual states, and phylogenetic analyses were conducted using the nuclear internal transcribed spacer rDNA (ITS) marker and the second largest subunit of ribosomal polymerase II (RPB2). Morphological and phylogenetic data revealed seven species: Darkera cf. parca; Strasseria geniculata; two novel Phacidium species: Phacidium dicosmoanum and Phacidium faciforme; and three novel monotypic genera described to accommodate distinct species: Calvophomopsis rubenticola, Cornibusella ungulata, and Gloeopycnis protuberans. Further analyses of Darkera spp. were performed with ITS and partial translation elongation factor 1-α (TEF1α), and the results suggest that D. parca is a species complex. Phacidiaceae includes hundreds of known species that are unrepresented by sequence data; therefore, ITS sequences were generated from herbarium material including type specimens of Darkera parca, Phacidium lunatum, and specimens of Allantophomopsiella, Allantophomopsis, Bulgaria, Phacidium, and Pseudophacidium species. The description of novel species combined with morphological observations and reference sequences will facilitate the identification of conifer endophytes, both from specimens or cultures and in environmental sequence data, and improve our understanding of this large and mostly neglected family.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".