Bibliographic record
Abstract
Autor prikazuje rezultate ankete provedene u tri grada kanadske pokrajine Québec (Montreal, Québec, Sherbrook). Cilj je bio utvrditi osnovne karakteristike jezičnog ponašanja hrvatskih iseljenika u sredini koja je od nedavno (1977) de iure jednojezična a de facto već dva stoljeća dvojezična (pogotovo Montréal). Anketa (27 pitanja) obuhvatila je 59 ispitanika raznih dobi i zanimanja, svi pripadnici prve generacije osim 5 djece od 10-15 godina koji pripadaju drugoj generaciji. Svi ispitanici govore hrvatski ali ih 10 uopće ne govori, a 6 slabo francuski. Na radnom mjesto 35 ih govori francuski, najčešće u kombinaciji s engleskim koji je u 12 slučajeva jedini jezik posla. U obitelji 22 ispitanika govore samo hrvatski, 4 samo engleski, 1 samo francuski, ostalo je višejezično. U 13 od ukupno 17 anketiranih obitelji djeca govore hrvatski (od toga su 3 mješovita braka) a u 4 obitelji (sve mješoviti brakovi) ga ne govore. Vrlo česta trojezičnost (Montréal) ne pogoduje očuvanju materinskog jezika, što će posebno doći do izražaja u drugoj generaciji. Tu pojavu trebat će pažljivo pratiti i sistematski istražiti.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".