Characterization of CuInS2 Thin Films Grown by Transducer-based Ultrasonic Spray Pyrolysis for PV Solar Cells Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For the first time, the elaboration of CuInS2 thin films was achieved using the transducer-based ultrasonic spray pyrolysis method with methanol as solvent. Precursor solutions were prepared with copper dichloride dihydrate [CuCl2.2H2O], indium (III) chloride tetrahydrate [InCl3.4H2O] and thiourea [SC(NH2)2] at different ratios. In2S3 clusters (μdots) were obtained from an aqueous solution with precursors ratio Cu:In:S = 1.3:1:3.9, 1.4:1:3.9, 1.5:1:3.9. CuInS2 thin films were obtained from a solution of methanol with precursors ratio Cu:In:S = 1:1:4. The In concentration was 3 x 10-3 mol/l. The crystalline structure and their morphology ware characterised by SEM and their chemical composition by EDAX, The bandgap of CuInS2, equals to 1.40 eV, was determined by spectrophotometry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".